Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

A famous riddle

July 28th, 2008 by Leonie

As a slight variation on my ongoing blog theme of what we can do with words, I’m posting one of the most famous word riddles around… (See www.fun-with-words.com for more.)

Words that End in Gry
The puzzle is essentially this: There are three English words ending in “-gry”. Two are “angry” and “hungry”. What is the third one?

There is no other common word ending in “-gry”, so how did the puzzle come about? It first appeared in print in 1975.

Perhaps the answer to the original version of the puzzle was meagry or aggry (as in “aggry bead”). There are over 100 obsolete words that end in “-gry” (see below), and these two were in use until fairly recently. However, since there is no longer a real answer to this, modern versions of the puzzle have turned from being puzzles to being riddles. There are perhaps as many as a dozen versions in circulation – each with a different answer!

We shall look at each of eight versions of the “-gry” puzzle, and their answers. (Some of these are discussed by Chris Cole in “Wordplay: A Curious Dictionary of Language Oddities”.)
——————————————————————————–
1. Think of words ending in “-gry”. “Angry” and “hungry” are two of them. There are only three words in “the English language.” What is the third word? The word is something that everyone uses every day. If you have listened carefully, I have already told you what it is.
The answer is language.
It is the third word of “the English language”. The question needs to be spoken, otherwise the quotation marks give away the trick. This version apparently originated in 1996.

——————————————————————————–
2. “Angry” and “hungry” are two words in the English language that end in “-gry”. “What” is the third word. The word is something that everyone uses everyday. If you have listened carefully, I have already told you what it is.
The answer is what.
The question states that “what” is the third word, then it asks for the third word. Again this version needs to be spoken to be effective.

——————————————————————————–
3. There are three words in English that end in “gree.” The first two are “angry” and “hungry,” and if you’ve listened closely you’ll agree that I’ve told you the third one.
The answer is agree.
It is a phonetic version of the riddle, asking for words that end in the sound “gree,” but tricks people into thinking about the letters g-r-y by giving the two examples.

——————————————————————————–
4. There are three words in the English language that end in the letters g-r-y. Two are “hungry” and “angry.” Everyone knows what the third word means, and everyone uses it every day. What is the third word?
The answer is energy.
The question asks for a word ending with the three letters g-r-y, but does not stipulate that they must be in that order.

——————————————————————————–
5. There are at least three words in the English language that end in g or y. One of them is “hungry,” and another one is “angry.” There is a third word, a short one, which you probably say every day. If you are listening carefully to everything I say, you just heard me say it three times. What is it?
The answer is say.
The question must be said in such a way that the word “or” sounds like the letter “r”. Once more, to be effective it is crucial that this version is spoken rather than printed. This version is first known to have appeared in 1997.

——————————————————————————–
6. There are three words in the English language that end in “-gry.” Two words that end in “-gry” are “hungry” and “angry.” Everyone knows what the third word means, and everyone uses them every day. If you listened very carefully, I have already stated to you what the third word is. What are the three words that solve this riddle?
The answer is I am hungry.
The question asks for three words that end in “-gry”, but does not say that they each must end in “-gry.”

——————————————————————————–
7. There are three words in the English language that end in “-gry.” One is “angry” and the other is “hungry.” Everyone knows what the third one means and what it stands for. Everyone uses them every day. And if you listened carefully I’ve given you the third word, what is it?
The answer is three.
It is the third word in the question, and the rest of the question is irrelevant: a red herring designed to put the solver off.

——————————————————————————–
8. There are only three words in the English language, all adjectives, which end in “-gry.” Two are “angry” and “hungry”; the third word describes the state of the world today. What is it?
This is the (presumed) original version of the puzzle from 1975. The possible answers (if obsolete words, names, and hyphenated compounds of “angry” and “hungry” are allowed) are plentiful. Most of the 124 listed below were in the 1933 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, and all have appeared in some major dictionary of English:
affect-hungry fire-angry MacLoingry Seagry
aggry Gagry mad-angry self-angry
Agry girl-hungry mad-hungry selfe-angry
ahungry gonagry magry sensation-hungry
air-hungry gry malgry sex-angry
anhungry haegry man-hungry sex-hungry
Badagry half-angry managry Shchigry
Ballingry hangry mannagry shiggry
begry heart-angry Margry Shtchigry
bewgry heart-hungry maugry sight-hungry
boroughmongry higry pigry mawgry skugry
bowgry hogry meagry Sygry
braggry hogrymogry meat-hungry Tangry
Bugry hongry menagry Tchangry
Chockpugry hound-hungry messagry Tchigry
Cogry houngry music-hungry tear-angry
cony-gry huggrymuggry nangry th’angry
conyngry hund-hungry overangry tike-hungry
cottagry Hungry Bungry Pelegry Tingry
Croftangry hwngry Pingry toggry
diamond-hungry iggry Podagry ulgry
dog-hungry Jagry Pongry unangry
dogge-hungry job-hungry pottingry vergry
Dshagry kaingry power-hungry Vigry
Dzagry land-hungry profit-hungry vngry
eard-hungry Langry puggry war-hungry
Echanuggry leather-hungry pugry Wigry
Egry ledderhungry red-angry wind-hungry
euer-angry life-hungry rungry yeard-hungry
ever-angry Lisnagry scavengry yird-hungry
fenegry losengry Schtschigry Ymagry

Until next time, have fun!



The Poetry Society’s National Poetry Competition 2008

July 14th, 2008 by admin

11 July 2008

Although the name suggests this poetry competition is national it is in fact international.

Whether you are an established poet or someone new to writing, winning often provides the essential spur to take your writing further. It is also an exciting opportunity to have your poems read by three of today’s leading poets, booster the coffers with £5,000 prize money, appear at the Ledbury Poetry Festival 2009, add your name to the long prestigious list of past winners, free annual membership of the Poetry Society and – if all that wasn’t enough  – an annual subsription for Aesthetica Magazine, the new media partner for the competition. The judges this year are Frieda Hughes, Jac k Mapanje and Brian Patten.

You can enter now at http://www.poetrysociety.org.uk/content/competitions/npc/

The competition is the longest running poetry prize and since it began back in 1978 has turned the spotlight on some exciting new poetry stars, as well as giving further encouragement to already established poets.

As well as entering the National Poetry Competition 2008 to discover your own potential, you can judge your own favourite competition winner from the past 30 years at http://www.poetrysociety.org.uk/content/npc30/

With best wishes

Juliet Wragge-Morley
Web and Information Manager
Arts Group
British Council, 10 Spring Gardens, London SW1A 2BN



Watch This. No – Read It!

July 9th, 2008 by Teri

A Case for Not Closing the Book



Spoonerisms – tips of the slung!

July 2nd, 2008 by Leonie

A Spoonerism refers to a type of word-play where the initial sounds or letters of two words in a phrase are swapped to create a new phrase that makes sense but is usually totally unrelated to the original phrase. Here is a selection of great Spoonerisms, courtesy of www.fun-with-words.com:

know your blows - blow your nose
go and shake a tower - go and take a shower
tease my ears - ease my tears
you have very mad banners - you have very bad manners
lack of pies - pack of lies
it’s roaring with pain - it’s pouring with rain 
bowel feast - foul beast 
wave the sails - save the whales
chipping the flannel on TV - flipping the channel on TV
mad bunny - bad money
I’m shout of the hour - I’m out of the shower
lead of spite -speed of light 
I hit my bunny phone - I hit my funny bone 
bedding wells - wedding bells
I must mend the sail - I must send the mail 
it crawls through the fax - it falls through the cracks 
bat flattery - flat battery
would you like a nasal hut? - would you like a hazel nut? 
belly jeans - jelly beans
eye ball - bye all
fight in your race – right in your face
ready as a stock - steady as a rock
no tails - toe nails 
soul of ballad - bowl of salad



Even good writers butcher language with extra words

July 1st, 2008 by admin

By Bill Paccone • June 27, 2008

http://www.pressconnects.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080627/OPINION02/806270323/1005/OPINION

We easily recognize atrocious sentences such as this one: “How would you react if someone were to repeat and repeat himself repetitiously in the exact same way, over and over and again and again ad infinitum.” We recoil at such superfluity.
Yet redundancy, perhaps the most flagrant of all language solecisms, daily slips unhesitatingly into our language. Having become inured, we seldom notice it. Even professional journalists bombard us with redundancies.

All of the following phrases, recently culled from reputable publications, contain a redundancy. Can you spot them?

* I’ll go get the dinner.
* He lost by one single vote.
* They divided it up.
* It was catapulted forward 100 yards.
* Bronxville is a good place for children to grow up.
* Its history we don’t know about.
* The bombing shattered and cracked its every window.
* She tried to subtract 10 percent off.
* They traveled around for an entire year.
* They heard symphonies by 23 different composers.
* Where did you draw your inspiration from?
* The coalition of religious parties was cobbled together from formerly dissident groups.
* They infiltrated into the enemy’s ranks.
* He extended the time forward for them.
* Others advanced forward.
* They whittled away at the inventory.

Even the following short phrases are redundant: to build up; to filter out; eschewing the street vernacular; rice paddies (though the latter has become acceptable notwithstanding that the word “rice” is unnecessary).

Sometimes more than one word must be removed to negate the redundancy. Consider the following:

* Over half of the petroleum we consume is imported into the United States.
* We take it for granted that a baby, once born, will grow into adulthood.
* Not one more dollar of money should be spent trying to rectify the situation.

And from Bill O’ Reilly we recently read that “Carranza executed three college students in Newark by shooting them to death.”
I’m sure, too, you’ve encountered some of the following ways the word “down” has been redundantly employed: the sun shining down; the rain falling down; narrowing down the possibilities; descending down the tribal route; shrinking the design down; tamping down; dwindling down; winnowing down; whittling down; simplifying things down; condemning it all down.

And so too with the word “away”:

* Obama shifted the conversation away from the subjects of race and gender.
* He marched away from his responsibilities.
* Cheetahs have been isolated away from visitors.
* Attention was diverted away from his misdeeds.
* The goalie deflected the ball away from the net.
* They turned away from their heritage.
* The Indians migrated away from the coastal zones.
* She moved a short distance away from her family.
* She was terrorized at being separated away from her children.
* Don’t shift away from your responsibilities.
* The cargo was diverted away from the harbor and then shipped away to China.
* He deflected the puck away.
* The tide ebbed away.
* Picture them sequestered away from the world.

Now observe what has been redundantly perpetrated with the word “out”:

* We filter out the light and screen out the misfits.
* We map out a strategy and edit out what we don’t like before we sift out the facts.
* Her winsomeness radiates out.
* We rent out a house and transfer out from the army into civilian life.

And then we have statements such as:

* Out of 150 donors examined, 3 out of 10 had to be refused.
* Vapors precipitated out as both rain and snow.
* Chinese rescue workers encouraged many elderly to stay, even as whole towns emptied out.
* Separate out the prisoner’s intentions from his actions.

What about his being toxically obsessed with ferreting out reporters’ preferences; the Republicans contracting out their canvassing operations; or people seeking out, plotting out, and figuring out what they should do?
The notion of “time” can also announce itself with inane redundancies. Consider the following: a lengthy period of time; at some point in the future; at some future time; at any given point in time; at this moment in time; from the same time period.

Additionally we may encounter:

* Stock splits have occurred over time.
* Numerous studies extend back in time.
* It’s something we’ll be able to use in the future.
* It happened several times in the past.
* It is still observed today.
* In three to five years they’ll be in a position to do it by then.

Should I dare ask if there exists any reader who has not encountered such solecisms “in the past?” Of course not!
Finally, the word “back” is probably employed redundantly more often than any other. Can anything excuse phrases such as: His commitment stretches back to his youth; turning one’s thoughts back to earlier times; asking for nothing back in return; a tradition dating back to an early age; ceding ground back to his adversary; relaying the answers back; pointing back to yesteryear; funneling back into the trough; relating back the information; reflecting sunlight back into space; shipping treasures back across the sea; reverting back to childhood; extending back to the 1800’s; shifting the emphasis back to a time before he was born?

These redundant “backs” continue to appear perhaps far more often than you ever thought possible.

Maybe you’ve even become accustomed to such abominations as:

* The illegal immigrants were transported back to Mexico.
* He hoped to return the relationship back to trust.
* His mind drifted back to the Civil War.
* The spacecraft sent back to earth its first observations.
* They vacillated back and forth.
* General Meyers transmitted the data back.
* They arrived back home.
* He had heard back from the company.
* They thought the animal existed back in former times
* They dispersed back into the mountains.

Remember, all of the foregoing statements have appeared recently in reputable newspapers and magazines.
And what about this egregious statement? “The president was firmly convinced in his own mind that every last thing he did was right.” Six words in this abominable sentence call for deracination.
Linguistically, it’s acceptable to throw a person out of the house or down the stairs; or to have him bed down anywhere; to give him the time of day or to look back over your shoulder and away from the sun. The problem is not with the words but with their needless usage.

On a final note, be reminded that in this column we’ve been considering only unnecessary repetitions. Of course, repetition can be employed gloriously and for sundry purposes including balance, emphasis, rhyme, transition, connection, alliteration, consonance, assonance, chiming, and even contrast or comparison.

“The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do.”
Thomas Jefferson